Cococubed.com Black Hole Mass Spectrum
Home Astronomy research   Software Infrastructure:      MESA      FLASH-X      STARLIB      MESA-Web      starkiller-astro      My instruments   White dwarf pulsations:      Probe of 12C(α,γ)16O      Impact of 22Ne      Impact of ν cooling      Variable white dwarfs      MC reaction rates      Micronovae      Novae   White dwarf supernova:      Stable nickel production      Remnant metallicities      Colliding white dwarfs      Merging white dwarfs      Ignition conditions      Metallicity effects      Central density effects      Detonation density      Tracer particle burning      Subsonic burning fronts      Supersonic fronts      W7 profiles   Massive stars:      Pop III with HST/JWST      Rotating progenitors      3D evolution to collapse      MC reaction rates      Pre-SN variations   Massive star supernova:      Yields of radionuclides      26Al & 60Fe      44Ti, 60Co & 56Ni      SN 1987A light curve      Constraints on Ni/Fe      An r-process      Effects of 12C +12C   Neutron Stars and Black Holes:      Black Hole spectrum      Mass Gap with LVK      Compact object IMF      He burn neutron stars   Neutrino Emission:      Identifying the Pre-SN      Neutrino HR diagram      Pre-SN Beta Processes      Pre-SN neutrinos   Stars:      Hypatia catalog      SAGB stars      Nugrid Yields I      He shell convection      BBFH at 40 years      γ-rays within 100 Mpc      Iron Pseudocarbynes   Pre-Solar Grains:      C-rich presolar grains      SiC Type U/C grains      Grains from massive stars      Placing the Sun      SiC Presolar grains   Chemical Evolution:      Radionuclides in 2020s      Zone models H to Zn      Mixing ejecta   Thermodynamics & Networks      Skye EOS      Helm EOS      Five EOSs      Equations of State      12C(α,γ)16O Rate      Proton-rich NSE      Reaction networks      Bayesian reaction rates   Verification Problems:      Validating an astro code      Su-Olson      Cog8      Mader      RMTV      Sedov      Noh Software instruments Presentations Illustrations cococubed YouTube Bicycle adventures Public Outreach Education materials 2023 ASU Solar Systems Astronomy 2023 ASU Energy in Everyday Life AAS Journals AAS YouTube 2023 MESA VI 2023 MESA Marketplace 2023 MESA Classroom 2022 Earendel, A Highly Magnified Star 2022 White Dwarfs & 12C(α,γ)16O 2022 Black Hole Mass Spectrum 2022 MESA in Don't Look Up 2021 Bill Paxton, Tinsley Prize Contact: F.X.Timmes my one page vitae, full vitae, research statement, and teaching statement.	Resolving The Peak Of The Black Hole Mass Spectrum (2022) Gravitational wave (GW) detections of binary black hole (BH) mergers have begun to sample the cosmic BH mass distribution. The evolution of single stellar cores predicts a gap in the BH mass distribution due to pair-instability supernova (PISN). Determining the upper and lower edges of the BH mass gap can be useful for interpreting GW detections from merging BHs. In this article We use MESA to evolve single, non-rotating, massive helium cores with a metallicity of $Z = 10^{-5}$ until they either collapse to form a BH or explode as a PISN without leaving a compact remnant. We calculate the boundaries of the lower BH mass gap for S-factors in the range S(300 keV) = (77,203) keV b, corresponding to the $\pm 3\sigma$ uncertainty in our high resolution tabulated $^{12}$C($\alpha$,$\gamma$)$^{16}$O reaction rate probability distribution function. We extensively test the temporal and mass resolution to resolve the theoretical peak of the BH mass spectrum across the BH mass gap. We explore the convergence with respect to convective mixing and nuclear burning, finding that significant time resolution is needed to achieve convergence. We also test adopting a minimum diffusion coefficient to help lower resolution models reach convergence. We establish a new lower edge of the upper mass gap as M$_{\rm lower}$ $\simeq$ 60$^{+32}_{-14}$ M$_{\odot}$ from the $\pm 3\sigma$ uncertainty in the $^{12}$C($\alpha$,$\gamma$)$^{16}$O rate. We explore the effect of a larger 3-$\alpha$ rate on the lower edge of the upper mass gap, finding M$_{\rm lower}$ $\simeq$ 69$^{+34}_{-18}$ M$_{\odot}$. We compare our results with BHs reported in the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog. Observing Intermediate-mass Black Holes and the Upper Stellar-mass gap with LIGO and Virgo (2022) In this article we probe the mass function of intermediate-mass black holes (IMBHs) wherein we also include BHs in the upper mass gap ∼60 - 130 M$_{\odot}$. Employing the projected sensitivity of the upcoming LIGO and Virgo fourth observing (O4) run, we perform Bayesian analysis on quasi-circular non-precessing, spinning IMBH binaries (IMBHBs) with total masses 50 - 500 M$_\odot$, mass ratios 1.25, 4, and 10, and dimensionless spins up to 0.95, and estimate the precision with which the source-frame parameters can be measured. We find that, at 2$\sigma$, the mass of the heavier component of IMBHBs can be constrained with an uncertainty of ∼10 - 40% at a signal-to-noise ratio of 20. Focusing on the stellar-mass gap with new tabulations of the $^{12}$C($\alpha$,$\gamma$)$^{16}$O reaction rate and its uncertanties, we evolve massive helium core stars using MESA, to establish the lower and upper edge of the mass gap as ∼59$^{+34}_{-13}$ M$_{\odot}$ and ∼139$^{+30}_{-14}$ M$_{\odot}$ respectively, where the error bars give the mass range that follows from the ±3$\sigma$ uncertainty in the $^{12}$C($\alpha$,$\gamma$)$^{16}$O nuclear reaction rate. We find that high resolution of the tabulated reaction rate and fine temporal resolution are necessary to resolve the peak of the BH mass spectrum. We then study IMBHBs with components lying in the mass gap and show that the O4 run will be able to robustly identify most such systems. Finally, we re-analyse GW190521 with a state-of-the-art aligned-spin waveform model, finding that the primary mass lies in the mass gap with 90% credibility.