![]() |
|
||||||||||
Home Astronomy research Software Infrastructure: MESA FLASH STARLIB MESA-Web starkiller-astro My instruments White dwarf supernova: Remnant metallicities Colliding white dwarfs Merging white dwarfs Ignition conditions Metallicity effects Central density effects Detonation density effects Tracer particle burning Subsonic burning fronts Supersonic burning fronts W7 profiles Massive star supernova: Rotating progenitors 3D evolution 26Al & 60Fe 44Ti, 60Co & 56Ni Yields of radionuclides Effects of 12C +12C SN 1987A light curve Constraints on Ni/Fe ratios An r-process Neutron Stars and Black Holes: Black Hole Mass Gap Compact object IMF Stars: Neutrino HR diagram Pulsating white dwarfs Pop III with JWST Monte Carlo massive stars Neutrinos from pre-SN Pre-SN variations Monte Carlo white dwarfs SAGB stars Classical novae He shell convection Presolar grains He burn on neutron stars BBFH at 40 years Chemical Evolution: Iron Pseudocarbynes Radionuclides in the 2020s Hypatia catalog Zone models H to Zn Mixing ejecta γ-rays within 100 Mpc Thermodynamics & Networks Stellar EOS 12C(α,γ)16O Rate Proton-rich NSE Reaction networks Bayesian reaction rates Verification Problems: Validating an astro code Su-Olson Cog8 Mader RMTV Sedov Noh Software instruments Presentations Illustrations cococubed YouTube Bicycle adventures Public Outreach Education materials 2022 ASU Solar Systems Astronomy 2022 ASU Energy in Everyday Life AAS Journals AAS YouTube 2022 Earendel, A Highly Magnified Star 2022 TV Columbae, Micronova 2022 MESA in Don't Look Up 2022 MESA Marketplace 2022 MESA Summer School 2022 MESA Classroom 2021 Bill Paxton, Tinsley Prize Contact: F.X.Timmes my one page vitae, full vitae, research statement, and teaching statement. |
Observing Intermediate-mass Black Holes and the Upper Stellar-mass gap with LIGO and Virgo (2022)
In this article we probe the mass function of intermediate-mass black holes (IMBHs) wherein we also include BHs in the upper mass gap ∼60 - 130 M$_{\odot}$. Employing the projected sensitivity of the upcoming LIGO and Virgo fourth observing (O4) run, we perform Bayesian analysis on quasi-circular non-precessing, spinning IMBH binaries (IMBHBs) with total masses 50 - 500 M$_\odot$, mass ratios 1.25, 4, and 10, and dimensionless spins up to 0.95, and estimate the precision with which the source-frame parameters can be measured. We find that, at 2$\sigma$, the mass of the heavier component of IMBHBs can be constrained with an uncertainty of ∼10 - 40% at a signal-to-noise ratio of 20. Focusing on the stellar-mass gap with new tabulations of the $^{12}$C($\alpha$,$\gamma$)$^{16}$O reaction rate and its uncertanties, we evolve massive helium core stars using MESA, to establish the lower and upper edge of the mass gap as ∼59$^{+34}_{-13}$ M$_{\odot}$ and ∼139$^{+30}_{-14}$ M$_{\odot}$ respectively, where the error bars give the mass range that follows from the ±3$\sigma$ uncertainty in the $^{12}$C($\alpha$,$\gamma$)$^{16}$O nuclear reaction rate. We find that high resolution of the tabulated reaction rate and fine temporal resolution are necessary to resolve the peak of the BH mass spectrum. We then study IMBHBs with components lying in the mass gap and show that the O4 run will be able to robustly identify most such systems. Finally, we re-analyse GW190521 with a state-of-the-art aligned-spin waveform model, finding that the primary mass lies in the mass gap with 90% credibility.
|
||||||||||
|
---|