![]() |
|
||||||
Home Astronomy research Software Infrastructure: MESA FLASH STARLIB MESA-Web starkiller-astro My instruments White dwarf supernova: Remnant metallicities Colliding white dwarfs Merging white dwarfs Ignition conditions Metallicity effects Central density effects Detonation density effects Tracer particle burning Subsonic burning fronts Supersonic burning fronts W7 profiles Massive star supernova: Rotating progenitors 3D evolution 26Al & 60Fe 44Ti, 60Co & 56Ni Yields of radionuclides Effects of 12C +12C SN 1987A light curve Constraints on Ni/Fe ratios An r-process Neutron Stars and Black Holes: Black Hole Mass Gap Compact object IMF Stars: Neutrino HR diagram Pulsating white dwarfs Pop III with JWST Monte Carlo massive stars Neutrinos from pre-SN Pre-SN variations Monte Carlo white dwarfs SAGB stars Classical novae He shell convection Presolar grains He burn on neutron stars BBFH at 40 years Chemical Evolution: Iron Pseudocarbynes Radionuclides in the 2020s Hypatia catalog Zone models H to Zn Mixing ejecta γ-rays within 100 Mpc Thermodynamics & Networks Stellar EOS 12C(α,γ)16O Rate Proton-rich NSE Reaction networks Bayesian reaction rates Verification Problems: Validating an astro code Su-Olson Cog8 Mader RMTV Sedov Noh Software instruments Presentations Illustrations cococubed YouTube Bicycle adventures Public Outreach Education materials 2022 ASU Solar Systems Astronomy 2022 ASU Energy in Everyday Life AAS Journals AAS YouTube 2022 Earendel, A Highly Magnified Star 2022 TV Columbae, Micronova 2022 White Dwarfs and 12C(α,γ)16O 2022 MESA in Don't Look Up 2022 MESA Marketplace 2022 MESA Summer School 2022 MESA Classroom 2021 Bill Paxton, Tinsley Prize Contact: F.X.Timmes my one page vitae, full vitae, research statement, and teaching statement. |
Burning Model Calibration, Reconstruction Of Thickened Flames, And Verification For Planar Detonations (2016) In this article we refine our previously introduced parameterized model for explosive carbon-oxygen fusion during thermonuclear supernovae (SN~Ia) by adding corrections to post-processing of recorded Lagrangian fluid element histories to obtain more accurate isotopic yields. A new method is introduced for reconstructing the temperature-density history within the artificially thick model deflagration front. We obtain better than 5% consistency between the electron capture computed by the burning model and yields from post-processing. For detonations, we compare to a benchmark calculation of the structure of driven steady-state planar detonations performed with a large nuclear reaction network and error-controlled integration. For steady-state planar detonations down to a density of 5 $\times$ 10$^6$ g cm$^{-3}$ our post processing matches the major abundances in the benchmark solution typically to better than 10% for times greater than 0.01 s after the shock front passage. Presented here with post-processing for the first time, we perform a 2D SN~Ia in the Chandrasekhar-mass deflagration-detonation transition (DDT) scenario. We find that reconstruction of deflagration tracks leads to slightly more complete silicon burning than without reconstruction. The resulting abundance structure of the ejecta is consistent with inferences from spectroscopic studies of observed SNe Ia. We confirm the absence of a central region of stable Fe-group material for the multi-dimensional DDT scenario. Detailed isotopic yields are tabulated and only change modestly when using deflagration reconstruction.
|
||||||
|
---|