*
Cococubed.com

Detonation Density Effects on
White Dwarf Supernovae

Home

Astronomy research
  Software Infrastructure:
     MESA
     FLASH-X
     STARLIB
     MESA-Web
     starkiller-astro
     My instruments
  White dwarf pulsations:
     12C(α,γ) & overshooting
     Probe of 12C(α,γ)16O
     Impact of 22Ne
     Impact of ν cooling
     Variable white dwarfs
     MC reaction rates
     Micronovae
     Novae
  White dwarf supernova:
     Stable nickel production
     Remnant metallicities
     Colliding white dwarfs
     Merging white dwarfs
     Ignition conditions
     Metallicity effects
     Central density effects
     Detonation density
     Tracer particle burning
     Subsonic burning fronts
     Supersonic fronts
     W7 profiles
  Massive stars:
     Pop III with HST/JWST
     Rotating progenitors
     3D evolution to collapse
     MC reaction rates
     Pre-SN variations
  Massive star supernova:
     Yields of radionuclides
     26Al & 60Fe
     44Ti, 60Co & 56Ni
     SN 1987A light curve
     Constraints on Ni/Fe
     An r-process
     Effects of 12C +12C
  Neutron Stars and Black Holes:
     Black Hole spectrum
     Mass Gap with LVK
     Compact object IMF
     He burn neutron stars
  Neutrino Emission:
     Neutrino emission from stars
     Identifying the Pre-SN
     Neutrino HR diagram
     Pre-SN Beta Processes
     Pre-SN neutrinos
  Stars:
     Hypatia catalog
     SAGB stars
     Nugrid Yields I
     He shell convection
     BBFH at 40 years
     γ-rays within 100 Mpc
     Iron Pseudocarbynes
  Pre-Solar Grains:
     C-rich presolar grains
     SiC Type U/C grains
     Grains from massive stars
     Placing the Sun
     SiC Presolar grains
  Chemical Evolution:
     Radionuclides in 2020s
     Zone models H to Zn
     Mixing ejecta
  Thermodynamics, Opacities & Networks
     Radiative Opacity
     Skye EOS
     Helm EOS
     Five EOSs
     Equations of State
     12C(α,γ)16O Rate
     Proton-rich NSE
     Reaction networks
     Bayesian reaction rates
  Verification Problems:
     Validating an astro code
     Su-Olson
     Cog8
     Mader
     RMTV
     Sedov
     Noh
Software Instruments
AAS Journals
   2024 AAS YouTube
   2024 AAS Peer Review Workshops

2024 ASU Energy in Everyday Life
2024 MESA Classroom
Outreach and Education Materials

Other Stuff:
   Bicycle Adventures
   Illustrations
   Presentations



Contact: F.X.Timmes
my one page vitae,
full vitae,
research statement, and
teaching statement.

Evaluating Systematic Dependencies Of Type Ia Supernovae: The Influence Of Deflagration To Detonation Density (2010)
In this article we explore the effects of the deflagration to detonation transition (DDT) density on the production of $^{56}$Ni in thermonuclear supernova (SN) explosions (Type Ia supernovae).

Within the DDT paradigm, the transition density sets the amount of expansion during the deflagration phase of the explosion and therefore the amount of nuclear statistical equilibrium (NSE) material produced. We employ a theoretical framework for a well-controlled statistical study of two-dimensional simulations of thermonuclear SNe with randomized initial conditions that can, with a particular choice of transition density, produce a similar average and range of $^{56}$Ni masses to those inferred from observations. Within this framework, we utilize a more realistic "simmered" white dwarf progenitor model with a flame model and energetics scheme to calculate the amount of $^{56}$Ni and NSE material synthesized for a suite of simulated explosions in which the transition density is varied in the range (1 - 3) $\times$ 10$^7$ g cm$^{-3}$.

We find a quadratic dependence of the NSE yield on the log of the transition density, which is determined by the competition between plume rise and stellar expansion. By considering the effect of metallicity on the transition density, we find the NSE yield decreases by 0.055 $\pm$ 0.004 M$_{\odot}$ for a 1 Z$_{\odot}$ increase in metallicity evaluated about solar metallicity. For the same change in metallicity, this result translates to a 0.067 $\pm$ 0.004 M$_{\odot}$ decrease in the $^{56}$Ni yield, slightly stronger than that due to the variation in electron fraction from the initial composition. Observations testing the dependence of the yield on metallicity remain somewhat ambiguous, but the dependence we find is comparable to that inferred from some studies.


image




image
image image
image



early deflagration phases
image