Cococubed.com Mader Verification Problem
Home Astronomy research   Software Infrastructure:      MESA      FLASH-X      STARLIB      MESA-Web      starkiller-astro      My instruments   White dwarf pulsations:      Probe of 12C(α,γ)16O      Impact of 22Ne      Impact of ν cooling      Variable white dwarfs      MC reaction rates      Micronovae      Novae   White dwarf supernova:      Stable nickel production      Remnant metallicities      Colliding white dwarfs      Merging white dwarfs      Ignition conditions      Metallicity effects      Central density effects      Detonation density      Tracer particle burning      Subsonic burning fronts      Supersonic fronts      W7 profiles   Massive stars:      Pop III with HST/JWST      Rotating progenitors      3D evolution to collapse      MC reaction rates      Pre-SN variations   Massive star supernova:      Yields of radionuclides      26Al & 60Fe      44Ti, 60Co & 56Ni      SN 1987A light curve      Constraints on Ni/Fe      An r-process      Effects of 12C +12C   Neutron Stars and Black Holes:      Black Hole spectrum      Mass Gap with LVK      Compact object IMF      He burn neutron stars   Neutrino Emission:      Identifying the Pre-SN      Neutrino HR diagram      Pre-SN Beta Processes      Pre-SN neutrinos   Stars:      Hypatia catalog      SAGB stars      Nugrid Yields I      He shell convection      BBFH at 40 years      γ-rays within 100 Mpc      Iron Pseudocarbynes   Pre-Solar Grains:      C-rich presolar grains      SiC Type U/C grains      Grains from massive stars      Placing the Sun      SiC Presolar grains   Chemical Evolution:      Radionuclides in 2020s      Zone models H to Zn      Mixing ejecta   Thermodynamics & Networks      Skye EOS      Helm EOS      Five EOSs      Equations of State      12C(α,γ)16O Rate      Proton-rich NSE      Reaction networks      Bayesian reaction rates   Verification Problems:      Validating an astro code      Su-Olson      Cog8      Mader      RMTV      Sedov      Noh Software instruments Presentations Illustrations cococubed YouTube Bicycle adventures Public Outreach Education materials 2023 ASU Solar Systems Astronomy 2023 ASU Energy in Everyday Life AAS Journals AAS YouTube 2023 MESA VI 2023 MESA Marketplace 2023 MESA Classroom 2022 Earendel, A Highly Magnified Star 2022 White Dwarfs & 12C(α,γ)16O 2022 Black Hole Mass Spectrum 2022 MESA in Don't Look Up 2021 Bill Paxton, Tinsley Prize Contact: F.X.Timmes my one page vitae, full vitae, research statement, and teaching statement.	The simplest test of detonation is the one-dimensional, gamma-law equation of state, rarefaction wave. Here a slab of material is ignited on one side and a detonation propagates to the other side. For a Chapman-Jouget detonation speed of 0.8 cm/s, it takes 6.25 $\mu$s for the detonation to travel 5 cm. The rich structure of a multi-dimensional detonation is absent, and a simple rarefaction wave follows the detonation front (e.g., Fickett & Davis 1979). Expansion of material in the rarefaction depends on the boundary condition where the detonation is initiated, which is usually modeled as a freely moving surface or a moving piston. For the Mader problem, a stationary piston is used. In this case, the head of the rarefaction remains at the detonation front since the flow is sub sonic, and the tail of the rarefaction is halfway between the front and the piston. This article, this article, and this article, discuss analytic and numerical solutions for the Mader problem. The tool in mader.tbz provide solutions as a function of time and position for the Mader verification test case. simple detonation here are less-simple ones