Cococubed.com an r-process
Home Astronomy research   Software Infrastructure:      MESA      FLASH      STARLIB      MESA-Web      starkiller-astro      My instruments   White dwarf supernova:      Remnant metallicities      Colliding white dwarfs      Merging white dwarfs      Ignition conditions      Metallicity effects      Central density effects      Detonation density effects      Tracer particle burning      Subsonic burning fronts      Supersonic burning fronts      W7 profiles   Massive star supernova:      Rotating progenitors      3D evolution      26Al & 60Fe      44Ti, 60Co & 56Ni      Yields of radionuclides      Effects of 12C +12C      SN 1987A light curve      Constraints on Ni/Fe ratios      An r-process      Compact object IMF   Stars:      Neutrino HR diagram      Pulsating white dwarfs      Pop III with JWST      Monte Carlo massive stars      Neutrinos from pre-SN      Pre-SN variations      Monte Carlo white dwarfs      SAGB stars      Classical novae      He shell convection      Presolar grains      He burn on neutron stars      BBFH at 40 years   Chemical Evolution:      Iron Pseudocarbynes      Radionuclides in the 2020s      Hypatia catalog      Zone models H to Zn      Mixing ejecta      γ-rays within 100 Mpc   Thermodynamics & Networks      Stellar EOS      12C(α,γ)16O Rate      Proton-rich NSE      Reaction networks      Bayesian reaction rates   Verification Problems:      Validating an astro code      Su-Olson      Cog8      Mader      RMTV      Sedov      Noh Software instruments Presentations Illustrations cococubed YouTube Bicycle adventures Public Outreach Education materials AAS Journals AAS YouTube 2022 MESA Marketplace 2022 MESA Summer School 2022 MESA Classroom 2022 MESA in Don't Look Up 2022 ASU Solar Systems Astronomy 2022 ASU Energy in Everyday Life Contact: F.X.Timmes my one page vitae, full vitae, research statement, and teaching statement.	Supernova fallback: a possible site for the r-process (2006) In this article we investigate the mass ejected by fallback in a supernova explosion. Trans-iron element production beyond the second peak is made possible by a rapid (< 1 ms) freezeout of α-particles that leaves behind a large nucleon (including protons!) to r-process seed ratio. This rapid phase is followed by a relatively long (≤ 15 ms) simmering phase at < 2x109 K, which is a consequence of the hydrodynamic trajectory of the turbulent flows in the fallback outburst. During the slow phase, heavy elements beyond the second peak are first made through rapid capture of both protons and neutrons. The flow stays close to the valley of stability during this phase. After freezeout of protons the remaining neutrons cause a shift to short-lived isotopes, as is typical for the r-process. A low electron fraction is not required in this model; however, the detailed final distribution is sensitive to the electron fraction. Our simulations suggest that supernova fallback is a viable alternative scenario for the r-process. Brad Meyer's article, is highly relevant in this scenario. ejecta after fallback abundance pattern of ejecta n, p, α evolution meyer ratio (unpublished)