Sedov Blast Wave
Verification Problem


Astronomy research
  Software Infrastructure:
     My instruments
  White dwarf supernova:
     Stable nickel production
     Remnant metallicities
     Colliding white dwarfs
     Merging white dwarfs
     Ignition conditions
     Metallicity effects
     Central density effects
     Detonation density effects
     Tracer particle burning
     Subsonic burning fronts
     Supersonic burning fronts
     W7 profiles
  Massive star supernova:
     Rotating progenitors
     3D evolution
     26Al & 60Fe
     44Ti, 60Co & 56Ni
     Yields of radionuclides
     Effects of 12C +12C
     SN 1987A light curve
     Constraints on Ni/Fe ratios
     An r-process
  Neutron Stars and Black Holes:
     Black Hole mass spectrum
     Compact object IMF
     He burn on neutron stars
     Variable white dwarfs
     Pop III with JWST
     Neutrino HR diagram
     Monte Carlo massive stars
     Pre-supernova neutrinos
     Pre-supernova variations
     Monte Carlo white dwarfs
     SAGB stars
     Nugrid Yields I
     Classical novae
     He shell convection
     Presolar grains
     BBFH at 40 years
  Chemical Evolution:
     Iron Pseudocarbynes
     Radionuclides in the 2020s
     Hypatia catalog
     Zone models H to Zn
     Mixing ejecta
     γ-rays within 100 Mpc
  Thermodynamics & Networks
     Stellar EOS
     12C(α,γ)16O Rate
     Proton-rich NSE
     Reaction networks
     Bayesian reaction rates
  Verification Problems:
     Validating an astro code
Software instruments
cococubed YouTube
Bicycle adventures
Public Outreach
Education materials
2022 ASU Solar Systems Astronomy
2022 ASU Energy in Everyday Life

AAS Journals
AAS YouTube
2022 Earendel, A Highly Magnified Star
2022 TV Columbae, Micronova
2022 White Dwarfs and 12C(α,γ)16O
2022 MESA VI
2022 MESA in Don't Look Up
2022 MESA Marketplace
2012-2023 MESA Schools
2022 MESA Classroom
2021 Bill Paxton, Tinsley Prize

Contact: F.X.Timmes
my one page vitae,
full vitae,
research statement, and
teaching statement.
The tool sedov.tbz calculates Sedov solutions. Jeremiah Moskal and Jared Workman have ported/refactored this instrument to sedov_python.zip.

The venerable Sedov problem might appear to be an old solved problem. However, there is a paucity of open-knowledge software instruments that find all possible families of real solutions, in all common geometries, and address all the removable singularities. In this article we describe the generation of robust numerical solutions for a Sedov blast wave propagating through a density gradient $\rho = \rho_0 r^{-\omega}$ in planar, cylindrical or spherical geometry for the standard, transitional, and vacuum cases. In the standard case a nonzero solution extends from the shock to the origin, where the pressure is finite. In the transitional case a nonzero solution extends from the shock to the origin, where the pressure vanishes. In the vacuum case a nonzero solution extends from the shock to a boundary point, where the density vanishes. See Jim Kamm's article and David Book's slightly irreverant article.

The constant density, spherically symmetric Sedov blast wave is a stalwart test case for verification of hydrodynamic codes. However, it is not a particularily difficult test for a modern shock capturing hydrocode. In this article we identify more challenging Sedov blast waves for hydrocode verification purposes. Analytic and numerical solutions for verification purposes are discussed in this article, this article, and this article.

Four Sedov functions describe the spatial variation of density, material speed, and pressure with distance at any point in time:

Spherical geometry:
image image
image image

Cylindrical geometry:
image image
image image

Planar geometry:
image image
image image

Energy Integral:

Some verification efforts:
image image