![]() |
|
||||||||
Home Astronomy research Software Infrastructure: MESA FLASH STARLIB MESA-Web starkiller-astro My instruments White dwarf supernova: Remnant metallicities Colliding white dwarfs Merging white dwarfs Ignition conditions Metallicity effects Central density effects Detonation density effects Tracer particle burning Subsonic burning fronts Supersonic burning fronts W7 profiles Massive star supernova: Rotating progenitors 3D evolution 26Al & 60Fe 44Ti, 60Co & 56Ni Yields of radionuclides Effects of 12C +12C SN 1987A light curve Constraints on Ni/Fe ratios An r-process Neutron Stars and Black Holes: Black Hole Mass Gap Compact object IMF Stars: Neutrino HR diagram Pulsating white dwarfs Pop III with JWST Monte Carlo massive stars Neutrinos from pre-SN Pre-SN variations Monte Carlo white dwarfs SAGB stars Classical novae He shell convection Presolar grains He burn on neutron stars BBFH at 40 years Chemical Evolution: Iron Pseudocarbynes Radionuclides in the 2020s Hypatia catalog Zone models H to Zn Mixing ejecta γ-rays within 100 Mpc Thermodynamics & Networks Stellar EOS 12C(α,γ)16O Rate Proton-rich NSE Reaction networks Bayesian reaction rates Verification Problems: Validating an astro code Su-Olson Cog8 Mader RMTV Sedov Noh Software instruments Presentations Illustrations cococubed YouTube Bicycle adventures Public Outreach Education materials 2022 ASU Solar Systems Astronomy 2022 ASU Energy in Everyday Life AAS Journals AAS YouTube 2022 Earendel, A Highly Magnified Star 2022 TV Columbae, Micronova 2022 White Dwarfs and 12C(α,γ)16O 2022 MESA in Don't Look Up 2022 MESA Marketplace 2022 MESA Summer School 2022 MESA Classroom 2021 Bill Paxton, Tinsley Prize Contact: F.X.Timmes my one page vitae, full vitae, research statement, and teaching statement. |
On Stellar Evolution In A Neutrino Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram
(2020)
In this article we explore the evolution of a select grid of solar metallicity stellar models from their pre-main sequence phase to near their final fates in a neutrino Hertzsprung-Russell diagram, where the neutrino luminosity replaces the traditional photon luminosity. Using a calibrated MESA solar model for the solar neutrino luminosity (L$_{\nu,\odot}$=0.02398 $\cdot$ L$_{\gamma,\odot}$=9.1795$\times$10$^{31}$ erg s$^{-1}$) as a normalization, we identify $\simeq$ 0.3 MeV electron neutrino emission from helium burning during the helium flash (peak L$_{\nu}$/L$_{\nu,\odot}$$\simeq$10$^4$, flux $\Phi_{\nu, {\rm He \ flash}} \simeq$ 170 (10 pc/$d$)$^{2}$ cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ for a star located at a distance of $d$ parsec, timescale $\simeq$ 3 days) and the thermal pulse (peak L$_{\nu}$/L$_{\nu,\odot}$$\simeq$10$^9$, flux $\Phi_{\nu, {\rm TP}}\simeq$1.7$\times$10$^7$ (10 pc/$d$)$^{2}$ cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$, timescale $\simeq$ 0.1 yr) phases of evolution in low mass stars as potential probes for stellar neutrino astronomy. We also delineate the contribution of neutrinos from nuclear reactions and thermal processes to the total neutrino loss along the stellar tracks in a neutrino Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. We find, broadly but with exceptions, that neutrinos from nuclear reactions dominate whenever hydrogen and helium burn, and that neutrinos from thermal processes dominate otherwise.
|
||||||||
|
---|