SN 1987A Light Curve


Astronomy research
  Software Infrastructure:
     My instruments
  White dwarf supernova:
     Stable nickel production
     Remnant metallicities
     Colliding white dwarfs
     Merging white dwarfs
     Ignition conditions
     Metallicity effects
     Central density effects
     Detonation density effects
     Tracer particle burning
     Subsonic burning fronts
     Supersonic burning fronts
     W7 profiles
  Massive star supernova:
     Rotating progenitors
     3D evolution
     26Al & 60Fe
     44Ti, 60Co & 56Ni
     Yields of radionuclides
     Effects of 12C +12C
     SN 1987A light curve
     Constraints on Ni/Fe ratios
     An r-process
  Neutron Stars and Black Holes:
     Black Hole mass spectrum
     Compact object IMF
     He burn on neutron stars
     Variable white dwarfs
     Pop III with JWST
     Neutrino HR diagram
     Monte Carlo massive stars
     Pre-supernova neutrinos
     Pre-supernova variations
     Monte Carlo white dwarfs
     SAGB stars
     Nugrid Yields I
     Classical novae
     He shell convection
     Presolar grains
     BBFH at 40 years
  Chemical Evolution:
     Iron Pseudocarbynes
     Radionuclides in the 2020s
     Hypatia catalog
     Zone models H to Zn
     Mixing ejecta
     γ-rays within 100 Mpc
  Thermodynamics & Networks
     Stellar EOS
     12C(α,γ)16O Rate
     Proton-rich NSE
     Reaction networks
     Bayesian reaction rates
  Verification Problems:
     Validating an astro code
Software instruments
cococubed YouTube
Bicycle adventures
Public Outreach
Education materials
2022 ASU Solar Systems Astronomy
2022 ASU Energy in Everyday Life

AAS Journals
AAS YouTube
2022 Earendel, A Highly Magnified Star
2022 TV Columbae, Micronova
2022 White Dwarfs and 12C(α,γ)16O
2022 MESA VI
2022 MESA in Don't Look Up
2022 MESA Marketplace
2012-2023 MESA Schools
2022 MESA Classroom
2021 Bill Paxton, Tinsley Prize

Contact: F.X.Timmes
my one page vitae,
full vitae,
research statement, and
teaching statement.
The light curve of SN 1987A revisited: constraining production masses of radioactive nuclides (2014)

In this article, we revisit the evidence for the contribution of the long-lived radioactive nuclides $^{44}$Ti, $^{55}$Fe, $^{56}$Co, $^{57}$Co, and $^{60}$Co to the UVOIR light curve of SN 1987A.

We show that the V-band luminosity constitutes a roughly constant fraction of the bolometric luminosity between 900 and 1900 days, and we obtain an approximate bolometric light curve out to 4334 days by scaling the late time V-band data by a constant factor where no bolometric light curve data is available. Considering the five most relevant decay chains starting at $^{44}$Ti, $^{55}$Co, $^{56}$Ni, $^{57}$Ni, and $^{60}$Co, we perform a least squares fit to the constructed composite bolometric light curve. For the nickel isotopes, we obtain best fit values of M($^{56}$Ni) = (7.1 $\pm$ 0.3) × 102 M and M($^{57}$Ni) = (4.1 $\pm$ 1.8) × 10-3 M. Our best fit $^{44}$Ti mass is M($^{44}$Ti) = (0.55 $\pm$ 0.17) × 10-4 M. which is in disagreement with the much higher (3.1 $\pm$ 0.8) × 10-4 M recently derived from INTEGRAL observations. The half-lives of $^{60}$Co and $^{55}$Fe are quite similar, which introduces a degeneracy for the fitting algorithm. As a result, we can only give upper limits on the relevant production masses of M($^{55}$Co) < 7.2 × 10-3 M and M($^{60}$Co) < 1.7 × 10-4 M. Furthermore, we find that the leptonic channels in the decay of $^{57}$Co (internal conversion and Auger electrons) are a significant contribution and constitute up to 15.5% of the total luminosity. Consideration of the kinetic energy of these electrons is essential in lowering our best fit nickel isotope production ratio to [$^{57}$Ni / $^{56}$Ni] = 2.5$\pm$1.1 which is still somewhat high but in agreement with gamma-ray observations and model predictions.

[57Ni / 56Ni] after freeze-out
For canonically accepted values
Including freeze-out corrections
Importance of 57Co
Best fit