Cococubed.com Fitting to Conic Sections
Home Astronomy research Software instruments    Stellar equation of states    EOS with ionization    EOS for supernovae    Chemical potentials    Stellar atmospheres    Voigt Function    Jeans escape    Polytropic stars    Cold white dwarfs    Adiabatic white dwarfs    Cold neutron stars    Stellar opacities    Neutrino energy loss rates    Ephemeris routines    Fermi-Dirac functions    Polyhedra volume    Plane - cube intersection    Coating an ellipsoid    Nuclear reaction networks    Nuclear statistical equilibrium    Laminar deflagrations    CJ detonations    ZND detonations    Fitting to conic sections    Unusual linear algebra    Derivatives on uneven grids    Pentadiagonal solver    Quadratics, Cubics, Quartics    Supernova light curves    Exact Riemann solutions    1D PPM hydrodynamics    Hydrodynamic test cases    Galactic chemical evolution    Universal two-body problem    Circular and elliptical 3 body    The pendulum    Phyllotaxis    MESA    MESA-Web    FLASH    Zingale's software    Brown's dStar    GR1D code    Iliadis' STARLIB database    Herwig's NuGRID    Meyer's NetNuc Presentations Illustrations cococubed YouTube Bicycle adventures Public Outreach Education materials 2023 ASU Solar Systems Astronomy 2023 ASU Energy in Everyday Life AAS Journals 2023 AAS YouTube 2023 AAS Peer Review Workshops 2023 MESA VI 2023 MESA Marketplace 2023 MESA Classroom 2023 Neutrino Emission from Stars 2023 White Dwarfs & 12C(α,γ)16O 2022 Earendel, A Highly Magnified Star 2022 Black Hole Mass Spectrum 2022 MESA in Don't Look Up 2021 Bill Paxton, Tinsley Prize Contact: F.X.Timmes my one page vitae, full vitae, research statement, and teaching statement.	Lots of tools exist for fitting a set a data to a straight line. How about fits to a general conic $$ a x^2 + b x y + c y^2 + d x + e y + f = 0 \ , \label{eq1} \tag{1} $$ perhaps with a constraint that enforces a specific conic section? References I found useful include Thomas & Chan 1989, Halir & Flusser 1998, Fitzgibbon et al 1999, and Harker et al 2008. For direct (i.e., not iterative) least-squares fitting of data to an ellipse, fit_ellipse.f90.tbz will generate noisy data for an ellipse (an interesting problem itself!), fit the noisy data to equation (1) with the constraint $b^2 - 4 a c \lt 0$ that assures an ellipse, and report key geometric attributes such as the center coordinates, foci coordinates, lengths of the semi-major and semi-minor axes, and rotatation angle of the conic. This tool currently depends on the lapack routines dgetrf and dgetri to invert a 3x3 matrix and the lapack routine dgeev to obtain the eigensystem of a 3x3 matrix. For direct, least-squares fitting of data to a hyperbola, fit_hyperbola.tbz will do the same as above, except with the constraint $b^2 - 4 a c \gt 0$ that assures a hyperbola. Parabolas, defined by the constraint $b^2 - 4 a c = 0$ with zero to near machine precision, lie on the boundary surface between ellipses and hyperbolas. Two of the figures below show that $b^2 - 4 a c = 0$ is an elliptical cone with its vertex at the origin. All ellipses lie within the cone, hyperbolas lie outside the cone. Direct, least-squares fitting of data to a parabola is thus more involved than for ellipses or hyperbola. The tool fit_parabola.tbz will do the same exercises as its ellipse and hyperbola cousins above. For direct, least-squares fitting of data to a circle where the measure of fit goodness is an area and not a length, the tool fit_circle.tbz will do the same as its cousins above. For iterative least-squares fitting of data to a non-specific conic, the tool fit_nonspecific_conic.tbz will do a traditional singular value decomposition on equation (1) ala e.g., Gander, Golub & Strebel 1994. Here is an example of noisy parabolic data with the returned best fit coefficients suggesting the geometery is an ellipse.
	Please cite the relevant references if you publish a piece of work that use these codes, pieces of these codes, or modified versions of them. Offer co-authorship as appropriate.